HETable engineering overview
Technical scope, controls, and launch-readiness for engineering reviewers
This page gives a technical reviewer the fastest accurate picture of what HETable is, what it already includes in the app today, and which control surfaces matter most before go-live. It is built to support engineering, implementation, and parent-site product-page reviews without inflating claims beyond the actual codebase.
Product boundary
Real app surfaces already in the product
Integration and control surfaces
- API keys: scoped access around floor data, staffing, reports, ratings, and admin workflows.
- Webhooks: event handoff for staffing, ratings, assignments, and table-status workflows.
- Permissions + overrides: role and user-level control for sensitive actions.
- Audit log: activity review around settings and admin workflows.
- Security policies: idle timeout, IP allowlist, and brute-force lockout settings.
- Multi-location controls: locations dashboard and related oversight flows.
How the technical review should think about the workflow
Engineering review should focus on whether those layers stay aligned, whether role boundaries are clear, and whether the public product story stays inside that real boundary.
Go-live technical review checklist
- Confirm the published room and the host-facing workflow are aligned.
- Confirm role access around manager, host, floor-team, and guest-facing paths.
- Review permissions, audit, API keys, webhooks, and security-policy settings before launch.
- Confirm public buyer pages do not overclaim unsupported payroll, payment, or POS capabilities.
- Use the go-live checklist and workflow pages as the operational reference for rollout.
Direct answers
What should an engineering page say about HETable?
It should describe HETable as the HospiEdge table-management and guest-flow product, then explain the real app surfaces already present: floor plans, host workflows, reservations, waitlist, optional guest-led arrival paths, staffing alignment, reporting, and admin controls.
What should technical reviewers look at before launch?
They should review the role boundaries, guest-facing paths, permissions, audit visibility, API keys, webhooks, security policies, and location-level controls that surround the live service workflow.
Why is a public engineering page useful?
It helps technical buyers, implementation partners, and internal teams evaluate the real product boundary and control surface without relying only on broad marketing language.